The Ricoh Group is working to enhance its governance system in accordance with social awareness and various stakeholders aimed at strengthening competitiveness and continuously improving the system while ensuring transparency based on corporate ethics and legal compliance. In this way, the Ricoh Group will achieve continuous growth, and improve corporate value and shareholder value.
The Ricoh Group has introduced a corporate audit system. In addition, the Group is making efforts toward enhancing oversight of executive management by the Board of Directors and enhancing execution of operations by the executive officer system. Furthermore, by appointing Outside Directors, the Group is making efforts toward further enhancement of corporate governance by decision-making and oversight of executive management through discussion from their independent perspectives.
The nomination of Directors and Executive Officers and their compensation are deliberated by the Nomination Committee and the Compensation Committee, advisory bodies which comprise a majority of Outside Directors.
The results are reported to the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors is responsible for management oversight and important decision-making concerning Group management. By appointing highly independent Outside Directors, the Group ensures greater transparency in its management and decision-making. By leveraging the expertise and experience of each Outside Director, Non-executive Director, and Executive Director in holding profound discussions on important issues, the Company encourages challenges in new areas of growth, creating a structure that allows for management oversight from the viewpoints of various stakeholders, including shareholders. Four of the Board's eight Directors are Outside Directors (Independent Directors) – part of an effort to incorporate various views and opinions and to eliminate arbitrary decision-making in management.
As of June 26, 2020
Audit and Supervisory Board members hold discussions to determine audit and supervising policies and the assignment of duties, and monitor corporate management. Audit and Supervisory Board members attend important meetings, including but not limited to the Board of Directors meetings, and exchange information regularly with the representative director.
As of June 26, 2020
Nomination Committee/Compensation Committee
As part of the strengthening of management oversight functions by the Board of Directors, the “Nomination Committee,” which is chaired by a Non-executive
Director, and the “Compensation Committee,” which is chaired by an Outside Director, with the majority of members on both committees being Non-executive Directors and at least half of the members being Outside Directors, were established to ensure transparency and objectivity of nomination, dismissal, and compensation of Directors and executive officers, etc.
For the year ended March 31, 2019, the Nomination Committee was comprised of three Outside Directors, one Internal Non-executive Director, and one Internal Executive Director; and the Compensation Committee was comprised of four Outside Directors, one Internal Non-executive Director, and one Internal Executive Director, and both committees were comprised of a majority of Outside Directors chaired by an Outside Director.
Group Management Committee
The Group Management Committee (GMC) consists of executive officers and is a decision-making body empowered by the Board of Directors. The GMC facilitates deliberations and renders decisions on the Group's overall management from the perspective of total optimization.
The Disclosure Committee performs appropriate disclosure of information which may influence the decisions of investors in addition to promoting dialogue with shareholders and capital markets by proactively disclosing corporate information that contributes to investment decisions, and thereby seeks to develop relationships of trust with shareholders and capital markets as well as to achieve an appropriate recognition of the Ricoh Group. This committee is composed of representatives from the disclosure management division, accounting division, legal division, information-generating and acknowledging departments, the principal administrative divisions managing affiliates, the internal control division, and the CFO, who is responsible for information disclosure.
The Disclosure Committee makes decisions on the necessity of information disclosure through the disclosure procedures and the appropriateness and accuracy of disclosed content and it monitors the decisions of the CFO, who is responsible for information disclosure. Furthermore, the internal control division regularly evaluates the timeliness of information disclosure, the accuracy and validity of disclosure statements, and the validity of disclosure decisions, etc., and reports its findings to the Internal Control Committee and the Board of Directors.
Internal Control Committee
The Internal Control Committee is an organization to deliberate and make decisions on the internal control system of the whole Ricoh Group.
This committee is composed of GMC members and is chaired by the CEO. Delegated by the CEO, the committee determines the policies for internal control activities of the entire Ricoh Group in accordance with internal control principles, and periodically evaluates and rectifies the internal control development and operation status. In consideration of environmental changes, the committee makes proposals to the Board of Directors to revise the internal control principles as necessary.
Risk Management Committee
The Risk Management Committee is positioned as an advisory committee to the GMC and supports the decision-making of the GMC in the Group's risk management activities. It also promotes risk management activities of the entire Group and creates a highly feasible mechanism in line with the actual conditions by periodically revising the risk management system.
The committee is comprised of a chairperson appointed by the CEO, and representatives from each organization mainly undertaking the headquarters function. With its basic stance of “always be open to risks,” the committee convenes meetings as needed, and makes recommendations to the GMC even if risks are implied by parties outside the committee.
The Investment Committee is positioned as an advisory committee to the GMC, and verifies investment plans based on the validity of financial aspects including capital costs, and strategic aspects such as profitability and growth risks, etc. Members with expertise review and discuss diversifying investment projects to external entities in order to ensure consistency with management strategies and raise the efficacy of the investment while improving the speed and accuracy of investment decisions.
The committee mainly discusses investments from the aspects of strategies, finances, and risks, and its members include a chairperson appointed by the CEO, representatives from the business planning, accounting, legal, and internal control sections as specialists on each aspect as well as various experts depending on the project. The committee receives prior inquiries from planning departments to provide evaluations and advice after performing comprehensive discussion on the investment value of a project. Although the committee is not authorized to approve or disapprove of any investment projects, it assists the decision-maker in making objective decisions by clarifying the results of the committee's discussions on each project.
In order to improve the accuracy of decisions made in the entire Group to invest in external entities, the committee, which is an advisory body to the GMC, also handles projects below the minimum investment amount set out by the GMC. This is intended to strengthen the investment decision-making capabilities of the planning department as well as maintaining the flexibility of amending the minimum investment amount through recommendations to the GMC as necessary.
The ESG Committee aims to respond promptly and appropriately to the expectations and needs of stakeholders by continuously discussing medium- to long-term environmental, social, and governance issues faced by the Ricoh Group at a management-level and leading the discussions to the quality enhancement of the entire Group. The ESG Committee has the following specific responsibities:
The committee is chaired by the CEO, and is composed of GMC members, an Audit and Supervisory Board Member, and the General Manager of the Sustainability Management Division. The committee convenes quarterly and invites representatives of the business divisions associated with the subject of discussion, and provides a system to examine and discuss sustainability issues across the board.
Superior insight and judgment necessary for management functions
Character and personality
Positive trust relationships between Directors and management team for smooth performance of the oversight function
In addition to the same election criteria as for Internal Directors stated above, the election criteria for Outside Directors include expertise in different fields, problem discovery and solving capabilities, insight, strategic thinking capabilities, risk management capabilities, and leadership qualities.
We believe that the Board of Directors of the Company should be composed of directors with management ability and rich sense of humanity in addition to various viewpoints and backgrounds, on top of multilateral sophisticated skills. When considering the diversity, it is a policy of the Company to appoint appropriate persons based on their personality and insight irrespective of race or ethnicity or gender or country of origin or nationality, etc. This approach ensures diversity, with respect not only to these attributes, but also with regards to expertise and experience in each field related to corporate management.
We are making ongoing efforts to strengthen and enhance corporate governance for our sustainable growth and improvement of corporate and shareholder value.
To secure objectivity, transparency, and timeliness for procedures to appoint, dismiss, and evaluate
Directors, the CEO, and other members of the management team, the Board of Directors has in place the Nomination Committee, which is an advisory body to the Board of Directors.
To increase objectivity and independence, the Nomination Committee comprises a majority of Non-executive Directors with at least half of the Members being Outside Directors, and is chaired by a Non-executive Director. (During the year ended March 31, 2019, the committee was chaired by an Outside Director with three Outside Directors, one Internal Non-executive Director, one Internal Executive Director, and a majority of Outside Directors.)
The Nomination Committee deliberates on the following inquiries and reports on the deliberation and conclusions to the Board of Directors.
1) Nomination of candidates for CEO and Directors
2) Evaluation of the soundness of the CEO and Directors to continue in their duties
3) Evaluation of achievements of the CEO and Directors
4) Confirmation of status of CEO succession plans and development of future CEO candidates
5) Confirmation of appointment/dismissal proposals and reasons thereof for Corporate Vice Presidents, Group Executive Officers, Advisors, and Fellows
6) Approval or disapproval on the formulation, revision or abolishment of appointment/dismissal systems for Directors, Corporate Vice Presidents, and Group Executive Officers
Director candidates are nominated based on management ability, personality, and character, with emphasis on qualities that will improve the oversight functions of the Board of Directors. The Nomination Committee deliberates twice on the qualification of the candidates, and reports to the Board of Directors clarifying the basis for nomination. Subsequently, based on the reporting from the Nomination Committee, the Board of Directors deliberates from a shareholder perspective, and determines the candidates to be submitted to the General Meeting of Shareholders.
Directors are evaluated annually by the Nomination Committee. From the year ended March 31, 2019, the former one-step evaluation was modified to a two-step evaluation. In the first evaluation, careful and appropriate deliberations are made on the soundness of Directors to continue in their duties, ensuring timeliness of appointment and dismissal. In the second evaluation, Directors' achievements are evaluated with a multifaceted approach, and their issues are clarified through feedback in an effort to improve the quality of management. The Nomination Committee's deliberations and conclusions on the evaluation of Directors are reported to the Board of Directors to thoroughly oversee whether the Director is sound to continue in the role.
Furthermore, evaluations are based on such standards as “Management oversight status as a Director,” “Financial aspects including key management indicators regarding business results, return on capital, etc.;” and “Contribution to shareholders and evaluation by capital markets.”
The CEO succession plan is an important initiative for improving shareholder value and corporate value of the Ricoh Group in a continuous manner over the medium to long-term and continuously fulfilling the social responsibilities of the Group as a member of the society.
From the viewpoint of strengthening corporate governance, the Group works to establish a CEO succession plan with procedures that are objective, timely, and transparent.
1) CEO Evaluation
The CEO is evaluated annually by the Nomination Committee. From the year ended March 31, 2019, a two-step evaluation has been adopted. In the first evaluation, careful and appropriate deliberations are made on the soundness of the CEO to continue in his/her duties, ensuring timeliness of appointment and dismissal. In the second evaluation, the CEO's achievements are evaluated with a multifaceted approach, and his/her issues are clarified through feedback in an effort to improve the quality of management. The Nomination Committee's deliberations and conclusions on the evaluation of the CEO are reported to the Board of Directors to effectively oversee the CEO.
|(1) Financial viewpoint||Progress of the Mid-term Management Plan and business plans, return on capital, other key management indicators, etc.|
|(2) Shareholder and capital market viewpoint||Stock-related indicators including TSR, analyst evaluations, etc.|
|(3) Non-financial viewpoint||ESG measures, customer and employee satisfaction, safety and product quality, etc.|
2) Selection, development and evaluation of CEO candidates
Once a year, the CEO prepares a list of potential future CEO candidates together with a development plan for them and elaborates on the proposals at the Nomination Committee. The Nomination Committee deliberates on the validity of the CEO candidate list and development plans, provides advice to the CEO on candidate development, and reports the findings to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors confirms the validity of the candidate selection and development plans upon reporting from the Nomination Committee and is actively involved in the selection and development of CEO candidates.
CEO candidates are selected by terms in the table on the left according to the timing of the change. The backup candidate in case of accident in the table on the left is determined via resolution of the Board of Directors at the same time the CEO is selected.
The Nomination Committee deliberates on the development plan for future CEO candidates and gives guidance to the CEO, who provides growth opportunities suited to each candidate according to their individual targets, allowing the candidates to accumulate experience. The CEO also gives direct guidance to promote the candidate's development based on individual assessment.
CEO candidates are evaluated annually, and the CEO reports to the Nomination Committee regarding the status of achievements and growth of the CEO candidates. The Nomination Committee reviews the selection of CEO candidates, and reports the results to the Board of Directors. Upon reporting from the Nomination Committee, the Board of Directors evaluates the CEO candidates and confirms the validity of deliberations on which candidates are to remain, and is actively involved in the process.
Director compensation is used as an effective incentive to achieve sustainable increases in corporate earnings for the medium- to long-term, in the pursuit of increased shareholder value. In addition, from the viewpoint of strengthening corporate governance, measures to secure objectivity, transparency, and validity are taken in setting up compensation levels and determining individual compensation. The Company determines executive compensation based on the following basic policies:
Outside Directors with positions that are independent from business execution are only paid basic compensation, and they do not receive contingent compensation such as performance-linked compensation.
The retirement benefit plan was abolished as of the date of the 107th Ordinary General Meeting of executive Shareholders held on June 27, 2007. Total compensation amount for Directors paid in the year ended March 31, 2020 was ¥324,620,000.
Basic compensation consists of compensation pertaining to management oversight and compensation reflecting the importance of individual roles and management responsibilities.
The amount of bonuses paid to Directors is determined based on operating income. By setting operating income as the key performance indicator, which is strongly correlated with market capitalization, it further clarifies responsibilities of Directors for the business results of the entire Ricoh Group and the improvement of shareholder value. In addition, regardless of the results calculated through this framework, whether or not a bonus will be paid reflecting the status of governance and non-financial factors will be discussed by the Compensation Committee and decided by the Board of Directors.
Among compensation that reflects the stock price, compensation for acquiring stock is allocated in full for the acquisition of stock in the Ricoh Executive Stock Ownerships Plan as an incentive for increasing shareholder value over the medium to longterm. Stock price-linked compensation (monetary compensation) was abolished and stock-based incentive with stock price conditions was introduced during FY2019. Both compensation for acquiring stock and the stock price-linked compensation abolished in FY2019 were paid to Directors by the Company in cash. As for FY2019, a total of ¥12.99 million was paid. The amount of expense recorded pertaining to points granted under the stock-based compensation with stock price conditions, introduced during FY2019, was ¥5.75 million.